Posts Tagged ‘Intel Processors’
AMD or Intel processor?
msstew15 asked:
Which is better AMD or Intel processors? Im looking to play games and edit videos, stuff like that
Which is better AMD or Intel processors? Im looking to play games and edit videos, stuff like that
can anybody pls. provide me a comparison chart bet’n intel core 2duo processor e6700 & amd athlon x2 5000+
ranveer asked:
i wanted to buy a system ,so i wanted some sort of comparison of rates between amd preocessors as well as intel processors with their price listing and superiority…………………….and which motherboard to be prefered for such processors ??????????????????????????????
i wanted to buy a system ,so i wanted some sort of comparison of rates between amd preocessors as well as intel processors with their price listing and superiority…………………….and which motherboard to be prefered for such processors ??????????????????????????????
What’s the fastest Intel processor and equivalent AMD processor?
Ian G asked:
…and since AMD doesn’t give processor speed in Ghz, how can I compare it with the Intel processors? Pls help. I’m trying to setup a new barebones system and I haven’t decided yet which processor to use.
…and since AMD doesn’t give processor speed in Ghz, how can I compare it with the Intel processors? Pls help. I’m trying to setup a new barebones system and I haven’t decided yet which processor to use.
What’s are some low power consuming intel or amd processor?
heartscared asked:
Of the processors made within the last 2 years, what’s are the lowest power processors made by intel and amd besides the laptop “mobile” processors.
Of the processors made within the last 2 years, what’s are the lowest power processors made by intel and amd besides the laptop “mobile” processors.
Should I opt for an AMD processor over an Intel?
tau.reanb asked:
I plan on buying a new computer soon and will be going with Dell. Dell currently has two models of the same system except they have different processors. I have always used an Intel processor, but I hear AMD processors are also pretty reliable.
I plan on buying a new computer soon and will be going with Dell. Dell currently has two models of the same system except they have different processors. I have always used an Intel processor, but I hear AMD processors are also pretty reliable.
Should I stick with the familiar, well known Intel or should go for a cheaper AMD system? Recommendations?
Amd Athlon Computers: at the Top of the Game
Felix K asked:
Two of the best manufacturers of CPU processors are Intel and AMD Athlon. These two companies have been raging war against each other ever since AMD Athlon beat Intel to releasing a 64bit processor. But despite this, AMD Athlon computers have not completely won the battle yet. The two companies have been trying to beat the competitor in terms of price, clock speed or performance, power consumption and heat production. There have been processor releases one after the other from these companies, making CPU processor shopping even more difficult. The good thing though with this war between Intel and AMD Athlon is that we are given an array of the best processors.
AMD Athlon computers have been around for a while now. They started with the release of the Athlon classic x86 processor way back when Intel’s Pentium 3 was the market leader. AMD Athlon’s first processor barely touched Intel’s market then. But in 2000, AMD Athlon dropped a bomb on Intel by releasing its Thunderbird processor. This time, AMD Athlon computers gained the market leader title over Intel’s Pentium 3. And ever since then, AMD Athlon has been competitively coming up with processors that seem to match, if not over perform Intel processors.
Let’s talk about speed!
If you are on the look out for a processor, you will probably check how AMD Athlon processors match with Intel’s in terms of price and performance. Over the years, AMD Athlon has continually tried to improve its clock speed and other features. Current AMD Athlon processors are the 64 x2 series and 64 fx series. The 64 x2 series offers a clock speed range from 2.3 GHz and 3.0 GHz while the 64 fx series offers a clock speed range from 2.6 GHz to 3.0 GHz. AMD Athlon may not always match or over perform every Intel processor but the latest processor did. The fx -74 processor out performs Intel’s Core 2 Extreme QX6700, with a 3.00 GHz clock speed compared to the latter’s slower 2.66GHz speed.
The Price Factor
Since AMD Athlon is the newer brand, it is only natural that they offer affordable prices. In fact, all their prices are lesser compared to Intel’s. The AMD Athlon 64 x2 series for instance is lower priced, between $170 and $500, compared to Intel Core 2 Duo series which are priced between $180 and $600. AMD Athlon processors are definitely more affordable, although the latest 64 fx – 74 is equally priced to its Intel counterpart.
Diversifying to Smaller Processors
AMD Athlon has also touched the market of notebook processors, with the Turion Series and the Mobile Athlon XP. To fit a notebook’s size, these types of processors are basically smaller, has lower heat production and power consumption.
Choosing the Right Processor
Although speed and price are important factors to consider when you buy processors, your PC usage should be the first determining factor. Why would you go for a high-speed processor when your PC usage won’t reach that speed? If your PC use is limited to word processing and internet surfing only, choosing from the list of AMD Athlon processors will have no difference. However, if you use your PC for high-speed computer games that requires faster clock-speed, you may want to check the top part of the AMD Athlon computers list.
Moreover, you may also want to consider buying cooling fans if you go with high-speed processors. Although AMD Athlon processors are manufactured to have lower heat production, cooling fans will help cool the processors more effectively especially if you plan to over-clock your CPU.
Two of the best manufacturers of CPU processors are Intel and AMD Athlon. These two companies have been raging war against each other ever since AMD Athlon beat Intel to releasing a 64bit processor. But despite this, AMD Athlon computers have not completely won the battle yet. The two companies have been trying to beat the competitor in terms of price, clock speed or performance, power consumption and heat production. There have been processor releases one after the other from these companies, making CPU processor shopping even more difficult. The good thing though with this war between Intel and AMD Athlon is that we are given an array of the best processors.
AMD Athlon computers have been around for a while now. They started with the release of the Athlon classic x86 processor way back when Intel’s Pentium 3 was the market leader. AMD Athlon’s first processor barely touched Intel’s market then. But in 2000, AMD Athlon dropped a bomb on Intel by releasing its Thunderbird processor. This time, AMD Athlon computers gained the market leader title over Intel’s Pentium 3. And ever since then, AMD Athlon has been competitively coming up with processors that seem to match, if not over perform Intel processors.
Let’s talk about speed!
If you are on the look out for a processor, you will probably check how AMD Athlon processors match with Intel’s in terms of price and performance. Over the years, AMD Athlon has continually tried to improve its clock speed and other features. Current AMD Athlon processors are the 64 x2 series and 64 fx series. The 64 x2 series offers a clock speed range from 2.3 GHz and 3.0 GHz while the 64 fx series offers a clock speed range from 2.6 GHz to 3.0 GHz. AMD Athlon may not always match or over perform every Intel processor but the latest processor did. The fx -74 processor out performs Intel’s Core 2 Extreme QX6700, with a 3.00 GHz clock speed compared to the latter’s slower 2.66GHz speed.
The Price Factor
Since AMD Athlon is the newer brand, it is only natural that they offer affordable prices. In fact, all their prices are lesser compared to Intel’s. The AMD Athlon 64 x2 series for instance is lower priced, between $170 and $500, compared to Intel Core 2 Duo series which are priced between $180 and $600. AMD Athlon processors are definitely more affordable, although the latest 64 fx – 74 is equally priced to its Intel counterpart.
Diversifying to Smaller Processors
AMD Athlon has also touched the market of notebook processors, with the Turion Series and the Mobile Athlon XP. To fit a notebook’s size, these types of processors are basically smaller, has lower heat production and power consumption.
Choosing the Right Processor
Although speed and price are important factors to consider when you buy processors, your PC usage should be the first determining factor. Why would you go for a high-speed processor when your PC usage won’t reach that speed? If your PC use is limited to word processing and internet surfing only, choosing from the list of AMD Athlon processors will have no difference. However, if you use your PC for high-speed computer games that requires faster clock-speed, you may want to check the top part of the AMD Athlon computers list.
Moreover, you may also want to consider buying cooling fans if you go with high-speed processors. Although AMD Athlon processors are manufactured to have lower heat production, cooling fans will help cool the processors more effectively especially if you plan to over-clock your CPU.
Amd or Intel – Making the Decision
Predator Computing LLC asked:
br/>Ever since Intel launched its Core2 Duo processors in 2006, AMD has struggled to keep up. In order to compete effectively and maintain its already small market share, AMD has had to slash its prices on its processor lines. AMD has been unable to show a profit for almost two years, which has made it more difficult for the company to move to 45nm (one of the few ways to match Intel’s performance) and streamline their fabrication techniques. In early 2008, AMD launched its Phenom processors. Many wondered if AMD would be able to regain the performance advantage it held for most of 2005 after Intel failed to meet expectations with ultimately unsuccessful enhancements to the Pentium 4; AMD failed. Today, AMD competes by trying to win customers on a solid value proposition. In addition, the company has also tried to give its customers a more solid upgrade path by allowing customers to upgrade in favor of faster processors without any major hardware changes. Soon, AMD will be moving to a 45nm architecture, which, if expectations are correct, should put them within reach of Intel’s best processors, but Intel is ready with a new chip design of their own.
Pros:
Solid Upgrade Path & Integrated Memory Controller
Great Value Proposition
Support for Hybrid SLI via Motherboard Chipset
Cons:
Outperformed By Intel
Lack Solid Innovation
Intel Intel has consistently dominated the desktop processor market in terms of market share since personal computers became mainstream. Due to its size, Intel has been subjective to a variety of lawsuits alleging that Intel should be regulated to promote fairer competition. For years, Intel has consistently fabricated the fastest processors. One is probably familiar with the company’s renown “Pentium” brand. In 2005, the company faced its first real challenge when AMD took the performance crown from them. Intel struck back hard with its subsequent processor offerings and has remained unsurpassed to this day. Intel is currently producing a healthy and broad line of 45nm processors; these processor also have superior overclocking potential because of their efficient design. Around the time AMD is scheduled to launch its 45nm Phenoms, Intel is expected to launch Nahalem, which should improve current performance by 25-30% over existing architecture. Depending on the timing of this launch, Intel could retain its performance crown until late 2009 when AMD finally launches its next processor line.
Pros:
Top Performing
Innovative
Support for DDR3 Memory
Cons:
Performance at a Cost
Poorer Upgradability
br/>Ever since Intel launched its Core2 Duo processors in 2006, AMD has struggled to keep up. In order to compete effectively and maintain its already small market share, AMD has had to slash its prices on its processor lines. AMD has been unable to show a profit for almost two years, which has made it more difficult for the company to move to 45nm (one of the few ways to match Intel’s performance) and streamline their fabrication techniques. In early 2008, AMD launched its Phenom processors. Many wondered if AMD would be able to regain the performance advantage it held for most of 2005 after Intel failed to meet expectations with ultimately unsuccessful enhancements to the Pentium 4; AMD failed. Today, AMD competes by trying to win customers on a solid value proposition. In addition, the company has also tried to give its customers a more solid upgrade path by allowing customers to upgrade in favor of faster processors without any major hardware changes. Soon, AMD will be moving to a 45nm architecture, which, if expectations are correct, should put them within reach of Intel’s best processors, but Intel is ready with a new chip design of their own.
Pros:
Solid Upgrade Path & Integrated Memory Controller
Great Value Proposition
Support for Hybrid SLI via Motherboard Chipset
Cons:
Outperformed By Intel
Lack Solid Innovation
Intel Intel has consistently dominated the desktop processor market in terms of market share since personal computers became mainstream. Due to its size, Intel has been subjective to a variety of lawsuits alleging that Intel should be regulated to promote fairer competition. For years, Intel has consistently fabricated the fastest processors. One is probably familiar with the company’s renown “Pentium” brand. In 2005, the company faced its first real challenge when AMD took the performance crown from them. Intel struck back hard with its subsequent processor offerings and has remained unsurpassed to this day. Intel is currently producing a healthy and broad line of 45nm processors; these processor also have superior overclocking potential because of their efficient design. Around the time AMD is scheduled to launch its 45nm Phenoms, Intel is expected to launch Nahalem, which should improve current performance by 25-30% over existing architecture. Depending on the timing of this launch, Intel could retain its performance crown until late 2009 when AMD finally launches its next processor line.
Pros:
Top Performing
Innovative
Support for DDR3 Memory
Cons:
Performance at a Cost
Poorer Upgradability